Simulation is a proving ground
The work models realistic uncertainty and non-stationary demand, but field conditions still require validation, safety review, and local stakeholder approval.
Measured against the baseline
The proposed framework was evaluated in a reality-grounded simulation across changing traffic regimes. These figures are evidence of a research result.
| Full day metric | Proposed RL-TSC | Baseline | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average vehicle wait | 62.01s | 119.94s | 48.3% lower |
| Average pedestrian wait | 51.09s | 161.98s | 68.5% lower |
| Idling-vehicle CO₂ | 414.93 kg | 549.81 kg | 24.5% lower |
Source: Teloq Systems technical paper
Wait less. Keep moving
The central result is lower modeled waiting time while vehicle and pedestrian throughput remain approximately comparable to the baseline.
Better flow starts with better feedback
We are building tools for the people who keep cities moving. Bring us the intersection that keeps you up at night.
Start a conversation ↗